Here’s what I’d like to send to Florida Senate President Don Gaetz, but… we’re not friends
Dear FL Senate President Don Gaetz and the Florida Senate:
I’ve read and re-read the recent Miami Herald article posted Sunday March 16, 2014: Beer distributors, brewers fight over growlers where you are stated as saying you are a “free-market, pro-business legislator,” and I cannot seem to reconcile what definition of free market you are using. I looked up the definition of free-market and every source emphasizes freedom from government regulations:
Merriam-Webster definition: free market: noun an economic market or system in which prices are based on competition among private businesses and not controlled by a government
www.investorwords.com/2086/free_market.html Definition of free market: Business governed by the laws of supply and demand, not restrained by government
dictionary.reference.com/browse/free+market free market —n: a. an economic system that allows supply and demand to regulate prices, wages, etc, rather than government policy : b. (as modifier): a free-market …
Yet Mr. Gaetz, you are quoted as saying:
“I’m with the beer distributors in my district. That’s a very important issue because one of my very best friends is an Anheuser-Busch distributor and he never talks to me about his business. It’s always about what are we going to do for disabled children, what are we going to do for the arts, what are we going to do for economic development. But this time he’s talking about growlers.”
How does the law of supply and demand fit in with your position, and why is it that Florida consumers can purchase 64-oz growlers legally in 47 other states, but cannot when they are at home?
I am also struggling to understand why Anheuser-Busch, which is now under Belgium InBev ownership, can garner Senate support for proposed craft brewery restrictions that would limit collaboration brewing and sales of brews from Florida-based and owned craft brewery locations.
Why is it that Florida continues to break ranks with the rest of the union by restricting growler size? Do Floridians really support allowing big business interests to trump and curtail the growth of an industry that other states fully support?
Do Floridians really know about The House Bill 1329, “Big Beer Bill”, AKA the “Craft Beer Killer Bill” to further curtail and restrict craft breweries statewide? Why would we want to turn our backs on an emerging market that is providing employment, income, tourist opportunities and vibrancy in our state?
Is there a new set of definitions for your free-market, pro-business stance that includes government regulation to protect a best friend’s business interests over and above those of small craft brewers, and of Florida consumers who freely choose to buy craft beer instead of your friend’s products?
As a Florida taxpayer, consumer, and confused voter, I’m hoping that there is a reasonable explanation that doesn’t include reference to political contributions or lobbyist influences.
Respectfully and truly yours…
As I consider whether to forward this on, I’m betting that the rest of the nation reads about us and remarks “Only in Florida…”